![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
westernindAn email to all University staff rooted out the photos!
It would have helped if the wedding planner hadn't addressed them to 'Rosalind English'. A nice enough name, but it ain't mine.
[Edited to add: Nice to have them because there are some shots, e.g. the ceremony and signing the register, that we didn't already have. But in my opinion![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
maleghast, nyarbaggytep and Chiara are all better photographers, and the photos I'll cherish come through their lenses. This doesn't bother me - I just find it amusing.]
It would have helped if the wedding planner hadn't addressed them to 'Rosalind English'. A nice enough name, but it ain't mine.
[Edited to add: Nice to have them because there are some shots, e.g. the ceremony and signing the register, that we didn't already have. But in my opinion
maleghast, nyarbaggytep and Chiara are all better photographers, and the photos I'll cherish come through their lenses. This doesn't bother me - I just find it amusing.]
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
Re: ...
Date: 2006-03-23 04:04 pm (UTC)My view would be that as long as someone pays for my time, then they can have the photos in digital format for a nominal fee (my time to convert and burn them + cost of media). I would assume that the reason they are paying for my time is that I would not retain the rights to the photos - if I did I could sell other people's wedding photos as stock art, and that does not seem right.
Yeah, I reckon there has to be a niche here - of course it will get a conspiracy of pro snappers wanting to kill me... *shrug*